<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Crawler is Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexloddengaard.com/2008/05/20/the-google-crawler-is-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexloddengaard.com/2008/05/20/the-google-crawler-is-fast/</link>
	<description>A blog by Alex Loddengaard</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.alexloddengaard.com/2008/05/20/the-google-crawler-is-fast/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexloddengaard.com/?p=206#comment-566</guid>
		<description>What exactly would they need to calculate in terms of PageRank? 

If they know that your post is extremely fresh, couldn't they operate under the assumption that no one else has linked to it yet (so initial PageRank is close to zero, or maybe some average of your older posts), and wait until they see incoming links in future posts from across the web?

Their indexing speed is nonetheless quite impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly would they need to calculate in terms of PageRank? </p>
<p>If they know that your post is extremely fresh, couldn&#8217;t they operate under the assumption that no one else has linked to it yet (so initial PageRank is close to zero, or maybe some average of your older posts), and wait until they see incoming links in future posts from across the web?</p>
<p>Their indexing speed is nonetheless quite impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Loddengaard</title>
		<link>http://www.alexloddengaard.com/2008/05/20/the-google-crawler-is-fast/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Loddengaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexloddengaard.com/?p=206#comment-562</guid>
		<description>I suppose what I'm most impressed with is Google's ability to index and compute PageRank in such little amount of time.  Regardless, thanks for the link, Sunil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose what I&#8217;m most impressed with is Google&#8217;s ability to index and compute PageRank in such little amount of time.  Regardless, thanks for the link, Sunil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.alexloddengaard.com/2008/05/20/the-google-crawler-is-fast/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexloddengaard.com/?p=206#comment-553</guid>
		<description>15 minutes is fast, but Google's job is made pretty easy by &lt;a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Update_Services" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress' use of XML-RPC pings&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15 minutes is fast, but Google&#8217;s job is made pretty easy by <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Update_Services" rel="nofollow">Wordpress&#8217; use of XML-RPC pings</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
